Compliance & Audit
Compliance Crosswalk
One policy maps to every framework. One tap generates evidence your stakeholders can trust — and powers the ship/no-ship call.
Overview
The SinzAI Compliance Crosswalk eliminates the gap between governance policy and regulatory evidence. Define your governance policies in SinzAI's policy language, and the crosswalk engine automatically maps each policy to the corresponding controls in NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM Top 10, EU AI Act, and ISO 42001. When auditors ask for evidence, you generate a complete report with one click.

Framework crosswalk showing NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM Top 10, EU AI Act, and ISO 42001 mappings.
CISA May 2026 Alignment
SinzAI is anchored to CISA's May 2026 Careful Adoption of Agentic AI Services guidance. The guidance identifies five risk categories — and SinzAI addresses every one:
Privilege Escalation
CISA Requirement
Agents may obtain or exploit elevated privileges beyond their intended scope
SinzAI Implementation
Scoped access with allow-list data stores, short-lived credentials with automatic rotation, cryptographic identity anchored to DIDs
Design / Configuration Flaws
CISA Requirement
Misconfigured agents may expose sensitive data or perform unintended actions
SinzAI Implementation
Registered purpose with behavioral drift detection, failure protocols with automatic degrade/halt, policy-as-code configuration with validation
Behavioral Misalignment
CISA Requirement
Agent actions may diverge from intended behavior due to prompt manipulation or environmental factors
SinzAI Implementation
Memory Governance detects behavioral drift, trust score drops on misalignment, HITL gates intercept anomalous actions
Cascading Failures
CISA Requirement
A single agent failure may propagate across interconnected systems
SinzAI Implementation
Containment layer isolates agents without affecting fleet, circuit breakers prevent cascading failures, kill switch provides instant fleet-wide intervention
Accountability Opacity
CISA Requirement
Lack of traceability makes it impossible to determine what an agent did and why
SinzAI Implementation
Append-only action ledger with cryptographic chaining, every action traceable to model version and prompt fingerprint, one-click rollback preserves full audit trail
NIST AI RMF Mapping
SinzAI maps to the four core functions of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework:
Govern
Organizational policies, accountability structures, and culture of risk management. SinzAI's Govern module directly implements Govern 2.0–2.3 (AI risk management policies, accountability, workforce training).
Map
Context recognition — understanding the AI system's purpose, stakeholders, and impacts. SinzAI's Detect + Map capabilities satisfy Map 3.0–3.5 (system context, benefits/risks mapping, impact assessment).
Measure
Quantitative and qualitative assessment of AI risk. SinzAI's Trust Score, behavioral drift detection, and continuous policy evaluation fulfill Measure 4.0–4.3 (risk identification, analysis, evaluation).
Manage
Risk treatment — responding to, communicating, and monitoring risk. SinzAI's HITL gates, containment, reversibility, failure protocols, and kill switch address Manage 5.0–5.3 (risk response, communication, monitoring).
OWASP LLM Top 10
| OWASP # | Risk | SinzAI Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 | Prompt Injection | Prompt fingerprinting + behavioral drift detection |
| LLM02 | Insecure Output Handling | HITL gates on external side effects |
| LLM06 | Sensitive Information Disclosure | Map: toxic combination alerts + data scope enforcement |
| LLM08 | Excessive Agency | Scoped access + HITL gates on writes/deletes/financial |
| LLM09 | Overreliance | Trust score + continuous behavioral alignment monitoring |
EU AI Act & ISO 42001
EU AI Act
- • Article 6 (Risk Classification): Map + Trust Score
- • Article 12 (Record-Keeping): Action Ledger
- • Article 13 (Transparency): Registered Purpose + Observability
- • Article 14 (Human Oversight): HITL Gates
- • Article 15 (Accuracy/Robustness): Failure Protocols
ISO/IEC 42001
- • Clause 5.2 (AI Policy): Govern — Registered Purpose
- • Clause 6.1.2 (Risk Assessment): Trust Score + Map
- • Clause 8.1 (Impact Assessment): Detect → Map pipeline
- • Clause 9.1 (Monitoring): Observability + Trust Score
- • Clause 10.1 (Improvement): Living Crosswalk